nerogi.blogg.se

Producteev vs nozbe
Producteev vs nozbe






  1. PRODUCTEEV VS NOZBE ANDROID
  2. PRODUCTEEV VS NOZBE MAC
  3. PRODUCTEEV VS NOZBE WINDOWS

Still, finally learning some advanced emacs is actually quite interesting (I have started looking into elisp as well, of course). This is not particularly easy for me, given that I am a hardcore vim user. I will stick with it for at least a month, and see if I manage to have it work my own way. So, I have decided to give org-mode a try.

PRODUCTEEV VS NOZBE ANDROID

Org-mode has the added benefit of having a good mobile application, which is working great on iPhone and iPad: MobileOrg. There is also an Android version, which I have not tried, not having an Android device. Org-mode is also great, probably the most flexible of them all (including OmniFocus this time), and based on plain text files. Taskwarrior seems already good enough, I really enjoy the ability to modify tasks using regular expressions, and all the tools around it (web interfaces, email to task, etc.). Only in the past couple of weeks I started to look at more geeky tools, and I came across two great options: Taskwarrior, and emacs' org-mode.

  • Flexible support of recurring tasks (look at what OmniFocus can do in this area and you will see what I mean).
  • The lack of a good implementation for start and due dates.
  • Coming from OmniFocus, all seemed too simplistic and limited, the main problems being:

    producteev vs nozbe

    These are just the names that come to mind, but I have gone through many others (including Things on the Mac, Toodledo, Wunderlist, and others).

    PRODUCTEEV VS NOZBE MAC

  • Asana: nice support of the keyboard (although the behavior is not consistent between Mac and Windows), but I will never get around the interface, and it also misses important features.
  • Producteev: again, missing important features.
  • Remember the Milk: nice and simple, but a little too simple for my needs.
  • Nirvana: missing important features, no desktop apps, no attachments.
  • Nozbe: missing important features, very poor support of keyboard shortcuts, desktop apps limited.
  • I have tried pretty much all web apps out there, and then some:

    PRODUCTEEV VS NOZBE WINDOWS

    Being stuck with Windows at work, I was using OmniFocus less and less, and I was finding it difficult to track my work effectively.

    producteev vs nozbe

    No comparable tools out thereįinally, I took the decision to look for a replacement for OmniFocus, to be able to jump back on the GTD wagon entirely: one of the principles of the methodology is to have a single trusted system for everything (personal, work, etc.). I was planning to write my own web app, but emulating OmniFocus' UX using today's web technologies is no easy task. There is no other desktop version: no Linux, no Windows, no web app (beside spootnik, which is particularly bad). There is only one problem: if you can't use a Mac, you are out of luck.

    producteev vs nozbe

    I loved it from the start: flexible, it does not get in your way, has all the features you could dream of, and has great and stunning UI and UX. I have been using OmniFocus since the very first version on the Mac, and I have started using it on the iPhone and iPad as soon as it came out. kGTD): kGTD was based on OmniOutliner, and is OmniFocus' predecessor. After some time I managed to use my Mac at work, and I discovered Kinkless GTD (a.k.a. Needless to mention, Outlook is as bad as a productivity tool as it is as an email application.

    producteev vs nozbe

    At the time I was stuck with Windows at work (as I am today unfortunately), so I tried to implement the methodology using Outlook. I have been sticking to the GTD methodology for quite some time I read David Allen's book in 2006, and have been sold to the methodology almost immediately.








    Producteev vs nozbe